Skip to content

Basirah demo

Put a number on your backlog. Then prove it moves. You've priced the backlog. Now watch a fix get proven. A re-tested fix seals its own evidence. See what your auditor gets. Behind every sealed certificate is a number. See what the fix was worth. SLAs should measure verified fixes. Start with what slippage costs you. Bring a HackerOne report. Watch Basirah prove the fix held. re-fires the same finding. Price the pile, then prove it. Close a ticket. Watch it reopen on a failed re-test. Verify the fix against the resource that already changed. Confirm the merged fix actually shipped. Prove the patch landed across the fleet. The incident's root cause, actually remediated.

Book a walkthrough that takes one finding all the way to verified, sealed proof. Below the form: a modeled exposure figure for your own open criticals and the real control coverage behind it.

Book the walkthrough

Bring your number. We'll take it to proof.

Book a time directly, or send the details first so we tailor the walkthrough. The proof sits just below.

You priced the backlog. Now check a sealed fix yourself — hash and all.

See the proof ↓

Here to prove remediation? The signed package your auditor reads is one scroll away.

See the proof ↓

Audit evidence starts with a dollar figure. See the number behind a sealed fix.

See the proof ↓

Your SLA clock should count verified closures. See what slippage really costs.

See the proof ↓

HackerOne found it. Watch Basirah prove the fix held, then seal it.

See the proof ↓

keeps re-firing the same finding. See the recurring pile priced as one number.

See the proof ↓

Close a ticket, then watch a failed re-test reopen it.

See the proof ↓

See a fix verified against the live resource itself.

See the proof ↓

See a merged fix re-checked against what actually shipped.

See the proof ↓

See a fleet patch proven host by host.

See the proof ↓

The vulnerability behind a incident, driven to a sealed, verified fix.

See the proof ↓

Already know you want a walkthrough?

Pick a time on the booking page. The brief still rides along — fill in only what helps us prep.

What are we looking at?

Ingest, assign, verify, seal — run by your own team.

Who's the main contact? *
What should we prove? (pick any)

About you

Tools & timing (optional)

Pick what you want to prove above and we’ll surface only the questions that fit — or add it all yourself.

By submitting this form, you agree to our Privacy Policy. We may use trusted service providers to process your request, as described in our Privacy Policy.

See your number

What's your open backlog costing you?

Three inputs, one modeled range. It's illustrative, and we show exactly how it's calculated. A demo swaps in your own findings and FAIR parameters.

Watch the seal hold

Check a sealed fix yourself.

The sealed certificate

This is what your auditor gets.

Start with the number

What was the fix actually worth?

Price the slippage

What does a slipping SLA cost?

After discovery comes proof

HackerOne finds it. Basirah proves it's gone.

Price the recurring pile

What is the re-firing backlog worth?

Closed, then checked

Does a closed ticket mean a fixed asset?

Against live cloud state

Did the fix survive the next deploy?

Merge to production

Did the merged fix reach production?

Host by host

Did the patch land on every host?

Past the closed incident

Is the incident's root cause really gone?

Modeled annual exposure from your open criticals
P50$648KtoP95$3.2M
modeled / illustrative — an estimate, never a measured figure
How we estimate this

A simple FAIR-flavored model, kept transparent on purpose. Each open critical carries a modeled annual loss-exposure. We scale it by how long findings stay open and by org size:

P50 = criticals × $9K × (MTTR ÷ 30d) × (headcount ÷ 1,000)P95 = P50 × 5 (tail spread)

The MTTR and size factors are bounded so the number stays sane at the edges. These are illustrative inputs. A demo replaces them with your own findings and your own FAIR parameters.

Drop a package here to check it

or click to choose the .zip. It's checked locally in your browser. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Evidence sealedPKG-SAMPLE-0001
Finding
CVE-2024-3094Malicious backdoor in xz-utils liblzma
Independent re-test
PASS
Modeled exposure
$2.1M$0
SHA-256f0613bdc6ef9…61aff8
Operator · ops.leadSealed · 2026-02-06

Download the package, then check it yourself on the verify page. The published hash above is the one your browser re-derives — nothing is sent anywhere.

Working a backlog this way? See how to cut it by exposure →

$3.1M
P95 exposure

A modeled range for the findings actually worth your time.

PASS
Verified closure

The re-test is the closure point — not a status change someone typed.

SOC 2
Control coverage

One sealed fix can answer more than a single audit question.

The coverage behind it

Real control coverage — the logo wall can wait.

A verified, sealed fix is audit evidence. Pick a framework to see the specific controls that closed loop satisfies.

CC7.1
Vulnerability detection and monitoring Findings from every connected scanner, deduped and ranked, detection trail kept.
CC7.2
Security event monitoring Each finding tracked from ingest to verified close. Nothing lost between tools.
CC8.1
Change management Remediation runs as owned, approved work with an immutable audit trail.

What drives the price

What moves the number.

Four things set the quote. Size most of them yourself before you ever talk to us.

Connected sources

Each scanner, SIEM, cloud account, and identity provider you wire in counts. One source is a different job from ten.

Reporting frameworks

Map to SOC 2 alone, or to the full set your board and auditors track. Every mapping is coverage we keep current.

Findings in flight

How much moves through ingestion, dispatch, verification, and signed evidence sets the working load.

Who operates it

Self-run, or Managed RiskOps where we drive the weekly work. Sovereign data and multi-region carry their own weight.

What you'll see in 30 minutes.

A walkthrough built around your environment

A real finding taken to verified, sealed proof

A connection plan for your scanners and ticketing

Common questions

FAQ

Does Basirah replace our existing scanners, SIEM, or ticketing tools?
Basirah connects to your current scanners, SIEM, and ticketing systems. It sits between detection and delivery as the system of action, and the system of record for verified remediation. It ingests findings from 55+ sources, creates owned remediation work, dispatches to Jira, ServiceNow, or Azure DevOps, and verifies fixes independently. Those tools stay in place. Basirah closes the gap between detection and proven resolution.
What does "verified fix" actually mean?
When a remediation owner marks work as done, Basirah does not trust the claim. It can trigger independent verification through configured methods such as scanner evidence, an API probe, or a manual check with evidence upload. The result is a concrete PASS or FAIL rather than a status update. If verification fails, the workflow can return the item to remediation and preserve the failure in the audit trail; SLA treatment follows the configured policy.
How does Basirah avoid duplicate tickets and keep Jira/ServiceNow in sync?
Dispatch uses an outbox queue with idempotency so retries don't create duplicates. Each Basirah work item stores the linked external ticket reference (Jira key or ServiceNow sys_id) and syncs status changes back through webhooks or polling. When a ticket moves to Done, Basirah shifts the work item to Pending Verification and waits for a verification PASS before crediting the fix.
Do we need to adopt FAIR risk quantification to use Basirah?
No, but it's the default for a reason. FAIR is the spine of prioritization in Basirah: it prices each finding in dollars (P50/P95) so your queue ranks by money at risk; a severity label can't paint half the backlog critical. Teams that aren't ready start in severity-only mode (Critical, High, Medium, Low) and switch on FAIR Monte Carlo simulation later, without re-onboarding. Verification, SLA enforcement, and evidence packages run the same either way.
How does Bassistant fit into the execution workflow?
Bassistant is Basirah's execution intelligence layer, connected to findings, SLA clocks, verification outcomes, and evidence history. It can explain why a finding is Fix Now, draft the remediation brief, and propose the next move with preview-confirm controls. Sensitive actions stay behind approval workflows.
What does an evidence package contain?
Each evidence package includes the finding snapshot, work-item timeline, verification results with method and PASS/FAIL outcome, SLA history, and uploaded artifacts. Exports carry SHA-256 hashes and checksum manifests, with optional signed manifests where evidence signing is enabled. You can check one yourself on the verify page.
Which compliance frameworks does Basirah map to?
Basirah includes control mappings for common frameworks such as ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST CSF, NIST 800-53, PCI DSS, NCA ECC, DORA, and NIS2. Evidence package context supports per-control drill-down and gap analysis, and overlapping mappings can reduce redundant audit work.